<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SRB Solicitors | Pauline Lawson</title>
	<atom:link href="https://srb.co.uk/category/pauline-lawson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://srb.co.uk</link>
	<description>Legal Advice South london</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Duties and Liabilities of Trustees</title>
		<link>https://srb.co.uk/duties-and-liabilities-of-trustees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor Peterhans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Lawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Client]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srb.co.uk/?p=4848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Duties and Liabilities of Trustees There has been significant case law in recent years regarding the duties and liabilities of trustees when faced with decisions regarding whether to sell or retain land, incur expenditure on repairs or to take legal action (Brudenell-Bruce v Moore [2014], Jeffrey v Gretton [2011], Cotton v Earl of Cardigan [2014]  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Duties and Liabilities of Trustees</h1>
<p>There has been significant case law in recent years regarding the duties and liabilities of trustees when faced with decisions regarding whether to sell or retain land, incur expenditure on repairs or to take legal action <i>(Brudenell-Bruce v Moore [2014], Jeffrey v Gretton [2011], Cotton v Earl of Cardigan [2014] </i>and<i> Page v West [2012]</i>)</p>
<p>Notably, in <i>Brudenell-Bruce v Moore [2014] </i>a beneficiary with a 49% share in the trust was unhappy with how the trustees had managed the trust’s assets. This beneficiary brought a number of claims against the trustees for allowing a building (forming part of the trust’s assets) to fall into disrepair, failing to re-let a property and allowing a non-beneficiary of the trust to live rent free in one of the properties. Both trustees were found to be in breach of trust, with one trustee ordered to repay the remuneration he had received as trustee and removed as trustee.</p>
<p>In <i>Jeffrey v Gretton [2011] </i>we were reminded that trustees are held to the standard to be expected of a reasonable, prudent man of business, meaning they need to review trust investments and to seek professional advice if they are unsure on whether to sell trust assets (e.g. land or property).</p>
<p>It is a trustee’s paramount duty to generally provide the greatest financial benefits for present and future beneficiaries, but, as case law shows, it is not always easy to know how best to do this and proper advice from reputable experts is essential.</p>
<p><strong>If you feel you would benefit from guidance, as a beneficiary or trustee, please contact the Private Client department at Stone Rowe Brewer LLP on 0208 891 6141 or by email at a.spall@srb.co.uk. </strong></p>The post <a href="https://srb.co.uk/duties-and-liabilities-of-trustees/">Duties and Liabilities of Trustees</a> first appeared on <a href="https://srb.co.uk">SRB Solicitors</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pension Schemes – Tax Implications Upon Death</title>
		<link>https://srb.co.uk/pension-schemes-tax-implications-upon-death/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor Peterhans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Lawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Client]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srb.co.uk/?p=4846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tax Implications for Pensions upon Death Major changes to tax charges that apply to benefits paid on the death of someone who was a pension scheme member took effect in April 2015. It is now extremely important that those who are members of pension schemes have a nomination form or letter of wishes in place  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Tax Implications for Pensions upon Death</h1>
<p><b></b>Major changes to tax charges that apply to benefits paid on the death of someone who was a pension scheme member took effect in April 2015.</p>
<p>It is now extremely important that those who are members of pension schemes have a nomination form or letter of wishes in place to nominate someone to receive their pension on their death. Those who are 75 and over also need to ensure that they have chosen the most tax efficient beneficiary or successor.</p>
<p><strong>If you feel you would benefit from guidance on the tax implications of defined contribution schemes, personal pensions and company pensions, please contact the Private Client department at Stone Rowe Brewer LLP on 0208 891 6141 or by email at a.spall@srb.co.uk. </strong></p>The post <a href="https://srb.co.uk/pension-schemes-tax-implications-upon-death/">Pension Schemes – Tax Implications Upon Death</a> first appeared on <a href="https://srb.co.uk">SRB Solicitors</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
